« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 140, Issue 1
, Pages 169-173
, July 2010
The impact of bridge-to-transplant ventricular assist device support on survival after cardiac transplantation
References
- . Left ventricular assist device therapy improves utilization of donor hearts. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1247–1254
- . Success rates of long-term circulatory assist devices used currently for bridge to heart transplantation. ASAIO J. 1996;42:M542–M546
- Cardiac Transplant Research Database Research Group. Cardiac transplant outcome of patients supported on left ventricular assist device vs intravenous inotropic therapy. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001;20:449–456
- . Development of anti-major histocompatibility complex class I or II antibodies following left ventricular assist device implantation: effects on subsequent allograft rejection and survival. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001;20:646–653
- 100 long-term implantable left ventricular assist devices: the Columbia Presbyterian interim experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:688–694
- . The effect of ventricular assist devices on post-transplant mortality: an analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing thoracic registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:264–271
- . HLA alloimmunization in patients requiring ventricular assist device support. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2002;21:1218–1224
- Factors influencing HLA sensitization in implantable LVAD recipients. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:1120–1125
- . Platelet transfusions are associated with the development of anti-major histocompatibility complex class I antibodies in patients with left ventricular assist support. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1998;17:876–880
- Avoidance of cellular blood product transfusions in LVAD recipients does not prevent HLA allosensitization. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1999;18:160–165
- Prevalence and risks of allosensitization in HeartMate left ventricular assist device recipients: the impact of leukofiltered cellular blood product transfusions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:1612–1619
- . Impact of left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-mediated humoral sensitization on post-transplant outcomes. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24:2054–2059
- . Does the type of ventricular assisted device influence survival, infection, and rejection rates following heart transplantation?. J Card Surg. 2009;24:250–255
- Does continuous flow left ventricular assist device technology have a positive impact on outcome pretransplant and posttransplant?. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:1774–1778
- . Interactions between the recipient immune system and the left ventricular assist device surface: immunological and clinical implications. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(6 suppl):S58–S65
- Allosensitization following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is dependent on CD4-CD40 ligand interactions. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001;20:211–212
- B-cell activation and allosensitization after left ventricular assist device implantation is due to T-cell activation and CD40 ligand expression. Hum Immunol. 2002;63:211–220
- Human leukocyte antigen sensitization in ventricular assist device recipients: a lesser risk with the DeBakey axial pump. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:945–949
- Association of device surface and biomaterials with immunologic sensitization after mechanical support. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:1372–1379
Disclosures: None.
PII: S0022-5223(10)00321-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.026
© 2010 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 140, Issue 1
, Pages 169-173
, July 2010
