The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 140, Issue 1 , Pages 39-44.e2, July 2010

Double-bar application decreases postoperative pain after the Nuss procedure

  • Tomohisa Nagaso, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Tomohisa Nagasao, MD, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University Hospital, Shinjuku-Ward Shinanomachi 35, Tokyo, Japan.
  • ,
  • Junpei Miyamoto, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Kiyokazu Kokaji, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Ryohei Yozu, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Hua Jiang, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Plastic Surgery, Shanghai Second Military Medical College, ChangZheng Hospital, Shanghai, China
  • ,
  • HongMei Jin

      Affiliations

    • TOYOTA Central Research Institute, Nippon, Japan
  • ,
  • Tamotsu Tamaki, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Nippon Institute of Technology, Nippon, Japan

Received 19 June 2009; received in revised form 6 November 2009; accepted 13 December 2009. published online 05 April 2010.

Objective

This biomechanical study aims to elucidate whether additional bar application increases postoperative pain after the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum.

Methods

Clinical evaluation: The intensity of postoperative pain was compared between patients for whom a single-bar was used (single-bar group: n = 14) and those for whom double bars (double-bar group: n = 10) were used to correct the thoracic deformity. The evaluation was performed by referring to the frequency with which local anesthetics were self-injected in a patient-controlled anesthetic system and how many days were needed for the patients to resume ambulation. Theoretical evaluation: An original simulation system for the Nuss procedure was developed by producing 3-dimensional finite element analysis models from computed tomographic data of patients with pectus excavatum. With this system, single-bar and double-bar placement was simulated separately for the thorax models of the double-bar group. The stresses occurring on the thoraces were then compared between the two situations.

Results

Clinical evaluation: Self-injection of local anesthetic was more frequent for the single-bar group than for the double-bar group; single-bar patients restarted ambulation later than the double-bar group. Theoretical evaluation: Stresses on the thoraces were smaller when double bars were applied than when a single bar was applied.

Conclusions

Performing double-bar placement decreases postoperative pain. Therefore, surgeons should not hesitate to perform double-bar correction in patients in whom the deformity extends to multiple intercostal spaces, requiring correction of the thorax shape at multiple sites.

CTSNet classification: 1, 5, 28

Abbreviation and Acronym: CT, computed tomography

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Part of the present study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (C-21500453).

 Disclosures: None.

PII: S0022-5223(09)01633-X

doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.12.027

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 140, Issue 1 , Pages 39-44.e2, July 2010