Journal Home
Search for

Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages 1295-1305.e4 (May 2010)


View previous. 36 of 82 View next.

Bridge to transplant experience: Factors influencing survival to and after cardiac transplant

Presented at the 87th annual meeting of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, May 5–9, 2007, Washington, DC.

Nicholas G. Smedira, MDabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Katherine J. Hoercher, RNab, Dustin Y. Yoon, MSa, Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, MScc, Lynne Klingman, MT, CHSd, Randall C. Starling, MD, MPHbe, Eugene H. Blackstone, MDac

Received 3 May 2007; received in revised form 13 November 2009; accepted 7 December 2009.

Objective

Balancing longer duration of mechanical circulatory support while awaiting functional recovery against the increased risk of adverse events with each day on support is difficult. Therefore, we investigated the complex interplay of duration of mechanical circulatory support and patient and device factors affecting survival on support, as well as survival after transplantation.

Methods

From December 21, 1991, to July 1, 2006, mechanical circulatory support was used in 375 patients as a bridge to transplantation, with 262 surviving to transplant. Implantable pulsatile devices were used in 321 patients, continuous flow was used in 11 patients, a total artificial heart was used in 5 patients, external pulsatile devices were used in 34 patients, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was used in 68 patients. Two time-related models were developed: (1) a competing-risks multivariable model of death on mechanical circulatory support, with modulated renewal for each sequential support mode; and (2) a model of death after transplant in which patient factors and duration of mechanical circulatory support were investigated as risk factors.

Results

Survival after initiating mechanical circulatory support, irrespective of transplantation, was 86% at 30 days, 55% at 5 years, and 41% at 10 years; survival was 94%, 74%, and 58% at the same time intervals, respectively, after transplantation in those surviving the procedure. Risk factors for death included longer, but not shorter, duration of mechanical circulatory support, use of multiple devices, global sensitization, and poor renal function.

Conclusion

Initiating mechanical circulatory support early with a single definitive device may improve survival to and after cardiac transplantation. Early transplant, which avoids infection, sensitization, and neurologic complications, may improve bridge and transplant survival.

CTSNet classification25, 34

a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

b George M. and Linda H. Kaufman Center for Heart Failure, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

c Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

d Allogen Laboratories, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

e Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Nicholas G. Smedira, MD, Surgical Director, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue/J4-1, Cleveland, OH 44195.

 D.Y.Y. supported by the American Heart Association Pre-doctoral Fellowship. E.H.B. supported in part by the Kenneth Gee and Paula Shaw, PhD, Chair in Heart Research.

 Disclosures: None.

PII: S0022-5223(09)01600-6

doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.12.006


View previous. 36 of 82 View next.