Journal Home
Search for

Volume 140, Issue 2, Pages 292-297.e2 (August 2010)


View previous. 8 of 65 View next.

In vivo functional flowmetric behavior of the radial artery graft: Is the composite Y-graft configuration advantageous over conventional aorta–coronary bypass?

Francesco Onorati, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Antonino Salvatore Rubino, MDa, Lucia Cristodoro, MDa, Cristian Scalas, MDa, Sergio Nucera, MDa, Francesco Santini, MDb, Attilio Renzulli, MD, PhD, FETCSa

Received 16 June 2009; received in revised form 22 September 2009; accepted 22 October 2009. published online 28 December 2009.

Introduction

Intraoperative flowmetric results of different configurations (Y-graft or aorta–coronary) of radial artery grafts have been poorly investigated.

Methods

We report the results of an observational study designed to analyze transit-time flow measurements at baseline and during 1:1 intra-aortic balloon pumping in 114 consecutive patients receiving the radial artery as a aorta–coronary bypass (group A, 72 patients) or as a Y-graft with the left internal thoracic artery (group B, 42 patients). Graft flow reserve, recruited by 1:1 intra-aortic balloon pumping) greater than 1 indicated recruitment of surplus graft flow. Results were stratified by grafted territory and surgical technique.

Results

Hospital outcome was comparable. Baseline transit-time flow results were similar between the 2 groups in terms of maximum diastolic flow, minimum systolic flow, mean flow, and pulsatility index. Graft flow reserve was not recruited by intra-aortic balloon pumping in 3 (2.7%) malfunctioning single aorta–oronary radial artery bypass grafts (P = .005 versus successful radial artery bypass grafts). Graft flow reserve was recruited (>1) by intra-aortic balloon pumping in the remaining 111 patent radial artery bypass grafts. Y-grafts showed higher maximum diastolic flow P < .0001), mean flow (P < .0001), graft flow reserve (P < .0001), percentage improvement of maximum diastolic flow (P < .0001), and of mean flow (P < .0001) compared with aorta–coronary radial artery bypass grafts. These results were confirmed for the right coronary (P ≤ .004) and the circumflex territory (P ≤ .001), for off-pump (P ≤ .008) or cardiopulmonary bypass (P < .0001) and for patients undergoing isolated bypass grafting (P < .0001).

Conclusions

Intraoperative flows of radial artery bypass grafts showed comparable baseline results in single aorta–coronary conduits and Y-grafts. Graft flow reserve recruited by intra-aortic balloon pumping was higher in Y-conduits, regardless of the grafted territory and the perfusion strategy chosen. Failed radial artery bypass grafts did not improve transit-time flow results during 1:1 intra-aortic balloong pumping nor showed any recruitment of graft flow reserve.

CTSNet classification23.1

a Cardiac Surgery Unit, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy

b Cardiac Surgery Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Francesco Onorati, MD, Cardiac Surgery Unit, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.

 Disclosures: None.

PII: S0022-5223(09)01393-2

doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.10.028


View previous. 8 of 65 View next.