The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 139, Issue 1 , Pages 68-75, January 2010

When is the Ross operation a good option to treat aortic valve disease?

Cardiac Program of the Peter Munk Cardiac Centre at Toronto General Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Received 29 April 2009; received in revised form 12 July 2009; accepted 30 September 2009.

Objective

We sought to identify suitable patients for the Ross operation.

Methods

A cohort of 212 patients (mean age, 34 ± 9 years; 66% men; 82% with congenital aortic valve disease) underwent the Ross operation and was prospectively followed with clinical evaluations and echocardiographic analysis for 3.1 to 18 years (mean, 10.1 ± 4.2 years). In addition to longitudinal outcomes determined by means of Kaplan–Meier analysis, Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of valve failure.

Results

There were 1 operative and 4 late deaths, none of which were valve related. Survival at 15 years was 96.6% ± 1.5% and similar to that seen in the general population matched for age and sex. There were 20 reoperations: 13 in the pulmonary autograft, 3 in the pulmonary homograft, and 4 others. Freedom from reoperation in the pulmonary autograft at 15 years was 92.1% ± 2.3%. Aortic insufficiency was the only independent predictor of reoperation. Freedom from moderate or severe aortic insufficiency at 15 years was 89.7%, and greater than mild aortic insufficiency was 63.2%. Male sex, aortic/pulmonary annular mismatch, aortic annulus of 27 mm or larger, and preoperative aortic insufficiency were associated with higher risk of late aortic insufficiency by means of log-rank analysis. Cox regression analysis identified male sex as the only independent predictor of postoperative aortic insufficiency. Freedom from moderate or severe pulmonary insufficiency, peak gradient of 40 mm Hg or greater, or both at 15 years was 70.8% ± 6.8%, and event-free survival was 81% ± 3.7%.

Conclusions

The Ross operation provided suboptimal results in male patients with aortic insufficiency. The best outcomes were in female patients, those with aortic stenosis, and those with an aortic annulus of less than 27 mm in diameter.

Abbreviations and Acronyms: AI, aortic insufficiency, CI, confidence interval, HR, hazard ratio

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Read at the Eight-ninth Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Boston, Mass, May 9–13, 2009.

PII: S0022-5223(09)01289-6

doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.053

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 139, Issue 1 , Pages 68-75, January 2010