The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 379-386, February 2010

Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: A novel morphology-tailored, patient-specific approach

  • Hyung Joo Park, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Hyung Joo Park, MD, Korea University Medical Center, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 516 Gojan-Dong, Ansan 425-707, Republic of Korea.
  • ,
  • Jin Yong Jeong, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea
  • ,
  • Won Min Jo, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea
  • ,
  • Jae Seung Shin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea
  • ,
  • In Sung Lee, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea
  • ,
  • Kwang Taik Kim, MD

      Affiliations

    • Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Young Ho Choi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea

Received 10 May 2009; received in revised form 8 August 2009; accepted 8 September 2009.

Objective

Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum, introduced by Nuss in 1998, has undergone a serious learning curve because of a lack of understanding on morphologies and repair techniques. To summarize the current status of minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum, we reviewed and appraised our 10-year experience with a novel approach, a morphology-tailored technique, including diverse bar shaping, bar fixation, and techniques for adults.

Methods

We analyzed the data of 1170 consecutive patients with pectus excavatum who underwent minimally invasive repair between August 1999 and September 2008. All pectus repairs were performed by the primary author (H.J.P.) with our modified technique.

Results

The mean age was 10.3 years (range, 16 months to 51 years). There were 331 adult patients (>15 years) (28.3%). A total of 576 patients (49.2%) had bar removal after a mean of 2.5 years (range, 10 days to 7 years). The asymmetry index change (1.10–1.02, P < .001) demonstrated post-repair symmetry. Complication rates decreased through the 3 time periods (1999–2002 [n = 335]; 2003–2005 [n = 441]; 2006–2008 [n = 394]) as follows: pneumothorax rate (7.5% vs 4.3% vs 0.8%; P < .001) and bar displacement rate (3.8% vs 2.3% vs 0.5%; P = .002). Reoperation rate also decreased (4.8% vs 2.5% vs 0.8%; P = .002). Satisfaction outcomes were excellent in 92.7%, good in 5.9%, and fair in 1.4% of patients. After bar removal, 3 patients (0.6%) had minor recurrences.

Conclusion

Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum based on a novel morphology-tailored, patient-specific approach is effective for quality repair of the full spectrum of pectus excavatum, including asymmetry and adult patients. Continuous technical refinements have significantly decreased the complication rates and postoperative morbidity.

CTSNet classification: 5, 28

Abbreviations and Acronyms: MIRPE, minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Disclosures: There is no external funding source for this study. There is no conflict of interest regarding this study.

PII: S0022-5223(09)01159-3

doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.003

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 379-386, February 2010