The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 138, Issue 5 , Pages 1100-1107 , November 2009

Narrowing the gap: Early and intermediate outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft procedures in California, 1997 to 2006

  • Joseph S. Carey, MD

      Affiliations

    • California Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Sacramento, Calif
    • University of California, Irvine, Calif
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Joseph S. Carey, MD, UCLA School of Medical Thoracic Surgery, 3475 Torrance Blvd, Suite B-1, Torrance, CA 90503.
    • ,
  • Beate Danielsen, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Health Information Solutions, Sacramento, Calif
    • ,
  • Jeffrey Milliken, MD

      Affiliations

    • California Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Sacramento, Calif
    • University of California, Irvine, Calif
    • ,
  • Zhongmin Li, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of California, Davis, California
    • ,
  • Bruce E. Stabile, MD

      Affiliations

    • Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, Calif

Received 19 December 2008 ,Revised 17 February 2009 ,Accepted 17 March 2009.

References 

  1. Carey JS, Danielsen B, Gold J, Rossiter S. Procedure rates and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures in California and New York. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:1276–1282
  2. Carey JS, Danielsen B, Junod FL, Rossiter SJ, Stabile B. The California cardiac surgery and intervention project: evolution of a public reporting system. Am Surg. 2006;72:978–983
  3. Li Z, Yeo KK, Mahendra G, Amsterdam E. Patient profiling of coronary artery bypass in comparison to percutaneous coronary intervention in California 2004. (Abstract) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(Suppl A):A233
  4. Takagi H, Kawai N, Umemoto T. Meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials on long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for multivessel coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:1259–1262
  5. Taggart DP. Coronary artery bypass graft vs. percutaneous coronary angioplasty: CABG on the rebound?. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2007;22:517–523
  6. Varani E, Balducelli M, Vecchi G, Aquilina M, Maresta A. Comparison of multiple drug-eluting stent percutaneous coronary intervention and surgical revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: one-year clinical results and total treatment costs. J Invasive Cardiol. 2007;19:476–477
  7. Bair TL, Muhlestein JB, May HT, Meredith KG, Horne BD, Pearson RR, et al. Surgical revascularization is associated with improved long-term outcomes compared with percutaneous stenting in most subgroups of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: results from the Intermountain Heart Registry. Circulation. 2007;11:I226–I231
  8. Hannan EL, Wu C, Walford G, Culliford AT, Gold JP, Smith CR, et al. Drug-eluting stents vs. coronary-artery bypass grafting in multivessel coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:405–407
  9. Apolito RA, Greenberg MA, Menegus MA, Lowe AM, Sleeper LA, Goldberger MH, et al. Impact of the New York State Cardiac Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System on the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J. 2008;155:267–273
  10. Moscucci M, Eagle KA, Share D, Smith D, De Franco AC, O'Donnell M, et al. Public reporting and case selection for percutaneous coronary interventions: an analysis from 2 large multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention databases. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1766–1768

 Disclosures: Supported by the California Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Blue Shield of California Foundation.

PII: S0022-5223(09)01015-0

doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.069

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 138, Issue 5 , Pages 1100-1107 , November 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution