The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 466-473, February 2010

Thoratec implantable ventricular assist device: The Papworth experience

Transplant Unit, Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Received 13 March 2009; received in revised form 26 June 2009; accepted 19 July 2009. published online 15 October 2009.

Objective

The Thoratec (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, Calif) implantable ventricular assist device (IVAD) can be used for univentricular or biventricular support. The objective of this study is to review the 5-year experience of bridging patients to heart transplantation with this device in a single center. Surgical aspects, including hybrid pump pocket, double tunneling of driveline, and optimal cannulae placement, are discussed.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of 24 patients treated between January 2002 and December 2007. Nineteen patients (79.1%) received a single implantable ventricular assist device as left ventricular assist devices, and 5 patients (21.9%) received 2 implantable ventricular assist devices as biventricular assist devices. The devices were implanted in pre-peritoneal/posterior rectus hybrid pump pockets. The driveline was passed through a 2-stage double-tunnel to exit onto the lateral chest wall. Patients were anticoagulated with Warfarin aiming for an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0.

Results

Twenty male and 4 female patients with a mean age of 39.8 years (17–57 years) and a body surface area of 1.87 m2 (1.63–2.2 m2) were supported for a total of 2308 patient-days. Mean duration of support was 96 days (10–301 days). The cause of heart failure was dilated cardiomyopathy in 18 patients and ischemic cardiomyopathy in 6 patients. Preoperatively, 23 patients were receiving inotropes, 12 patients required intra-aortic balloon pump support, 5 patients were intubated and mechanically ventilated, and 3 patients required continuous venovenous hemofiltration for renal support. Eleven patients (45.8%) were discharged with ventricular assist device support (1015 home patient-days). Complications observed were a) neurologic: stroke in 3 patients, transient ischemic attacks in 4 patients; and b) infection: driveline infection in 3 patients and pump pocket infection in 1 patient. There was no mechanical device failure. Support to transplantation was achieved in 17 patients (70.8%): 3 of 5 biventricular assist devices (60%) and 14 of 19 left ventricular assist devices (73.7%).

Conclusion

The Thoratec IVAD is a versatile and reliable ventricular assist device. It can provide univentricular or biventricular support for bridging patients to heart transplantation with acceptable complication rates. The portable Thoratec TLC-II console facilitated discharge while patients waited for a suitable donor heart.

CTSNet classification: 27, 34

Abbreviations and Acronyms: BVAD, biventricular assist device, CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass, CVVH, continuous venovenous hemofiltration, IVAD, implantable ventricular assist device, LV, left ventricular, LVAD, left ventricular assist device, PVAD, paracorporeal ventricular assist device, RV, right ventricular, RVAD, right ventricular assist device, VAD, ventricular assist device

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Disclosures: None.

PII: S0022-5223(09)01002-2

doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.07.058

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 466-473, February 2010