The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 139, Issue 3 , Pages 665-673, March 2010

Homograft aortic root replacement in native or prosthetic active infective endocarditis: Twenty-year single-center experience

This paper was presented at a lecture held at the 22nd EACTS Annual Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, September 13 to 17, 2008.

Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Berlin, Germany

Received 2 December 2008; received in revised form 16 June 2009; accepted 8 July 2009. published online 22 September 2009.

Objective

We compared early and long-term results of cryopreserved homograft aortic root replacement in native valve endocarditis or prosthetic valve endocarditis associated with periannular abscess.

Methods

Between May 1986 and December 2007, 1163 patients with endocarditis were operated upon. Of these, 221 patients (n = 185 men, median age 55 years) had homograft aortic root replacement due to 99 cases of native valve endocarditis (45%) and 122 of prosthetic valve endocarditis (55%). Perinannular abscess developed in 189 patients (86%), and aortoventricular dehiscence in 120 (63.5%) of them. Perioperative characteristics, probability of survival, freedom from recurrence, and reoperation were analyzed. Follow-up (mean 5.2 ± 0.4 years, maximum 18.4 years) was completed in 96.8% with a total of 1127 patient-years.

Results

Overall native valve endocarditis survival at 30 days and 1, 5, and 10 years was 83.8% ± 3.7%, 76.6% ± 4.3%, 66.5% ± 4.9%, and 47.3% ± 5.6%, respectively, significantly better than for patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis, who had a greater tendency toward abscess formation (P = .029). Thirty-one patients (14.0%) required reoperation either for structural valve deterioration (n = 19, 8.6%), with a greater tendency in patients aged <40 years, or for recurrent endocarditis of the homograft (n = 12, 5.4%). One-year reoperation mortality rate was 16.1% (n = 5).

Conclusions

Homograft aortic root replacement in active infective endocarditis with periannular abscess formation shows satisfactory early and long-term results with significantly better survival in native valve endocarditis than prosthetic valve endocarditis. It is associated with a low recurrence rate, although the risk of structural valve deterioration increases over time, especially in young patients, and reoperation remains a challenge. In our institution, the homograft remains the preferred valve substitute in active infective endocarditis with periannular abscess formation.

CTSNet classification: 35, 18

Abbreviations and Acronyms: AIE, active infective endocarditis, ARR, aortic root replacement, NVE, native valve endocarditis, PVE, prosthetic valve endocarditis, SVD, structural valve deterioration

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Disclosures: Name.

PII: S0022-5223(09)00939-8

doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.07.026

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 139, Issue 3 , Pages 665-673, March 2010