The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 139, Issue 4 , Pages 1001-1006, April 2010

Effect of selective lymph node dissection based on patterns of lobe-specific lymph node metastases on patient outcome in patients with resectable non–small cell lung cancer: A large-scale retrospective cohort study applying a propensity score

  • Futoshi Ishiguro, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Futoshi Ishiguro, MD, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-Ku Nagoya 461-8681, Japan.
  • ,
  • Keitaro Matsuo, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan
  • ,
  • Takayuki Fukui, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
  • ,
  • Shoichi Mori, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
    • Department of Thoracic Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya First Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
  • ,
  • Shunzo Hatooka, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
  • ,
  • Tetsuya Mitsudomi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

Received 18 February 2009; received in revised form 20 May 2009; accepted 8 July 2009. published online 07 September 2009.

Objective

Lobectomy with systematic complete mediastinal lymph node dissection is standard surgical treatment for localized non–small cell lung cancer. However, selective mediastinal lymph node dissection based on lobe-specific metastases (selective dissection) has often been performed. This study was designed to evaluate the validity of the selective lymph node dissection.

Methods

From 1995 through 2003, 625 patients in our hospital had surgery for complete mediastinal lymph node dissection and 147 for selective dissection. We evaluated whether selective dissection adversely affected overall survival. To minimize possible biases due to confounding by treatment indication, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis by applying a propensity score. The propensity score was calculated by logistic regression based on 15 factors available that were potentially associated with treatment indication. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to quartile, and comparison between selective dissection and complete mediastinal lymph node dissection was made using propensity score quartile-stratified Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

Comparison of baseline characteristics between patients having selective dissection and patients having complete mediastinal lymph node dissection according to propensity score quartile supported comparability of the 2 groups. The 5-year overall survival rates were 76.0% for selective dissection versus 71.9% for complete mediastinal lymph node dissection. The 5-year survival probabilities stratified by propensity score quartile consistently showed no marked difference. In multivariate models, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (hazard ratio = 1.17, P = .500) as also seen in the analysis without propensity score (hazard ratio = 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.68–1.64; P = .810). Therefore, selective dissection showed no significant impact on poor survival compared with complete mediastinal lymph node dissection.

Conclusions

Selective lymph node dissection did not worsen the survival of patients with non–small cell lung cancer.

CTSNet classification: 10

Abbreviations and Acronyms: CD, complete lymph node dissection, NSCLC, non–small cell lung cancer, OS, overall survival, PS, propensity score, RCT, randomized controlled trial, SD, selective dissection

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Disclosures: None.

PII: S0022-5223(09)00930-1

doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.07.024

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 139, Issue 4 , Pages 1001-1006, April 2010