The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 139, Issue 5 , Pages 1158-1161, May 2010

Meta-analysis of randomized trials on the efficacy of posterior pericardiotomy in preventing atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery

  • Fausto Biancari, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Fausto Biancari, MD, PhD, Division of Cardio-thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, PO Box 21, 90029 Oulu, Finland.
  • ,
  • Muhammad Ali Asim Mahar, MBBS

Division of Cardio-thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland

Received 13 March 2009; received in revised form 16 May 2009; accepted 6 July 2009. published online 19 August 2009.

Objective

Posterior pericardiotomy is considered a method to reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Its efficacy in preventing atrial fibrillation and supraventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass surgery has been evaluated in the present meta-analysis.

Methods

This meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews.

Results

The search yielded 6 prospective, randomized studies reporting on postoperative atrial fibrillation in 763 patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. The cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation was 10.8% in the posterior pericardiotomy group (PP group) and 28.1% in the control group (I2 68%, random effect: P = .003; odds ratio [OR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16–0.69). Supraventricular arrhythmias occurred in 13.8% of patients in the PP group and 35.4% in the control group (I2 70%, random effect: P = .002; OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15–0.65). Early pericardial effusion (6.9% vs 46.2%; I2 67%; random effect: P < .0001; OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.04–0.28) and late pericardial effusion (0% vs 11.3%; I2 0%; fixed effect: P = .0001; OR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01–0.21) were significantly less frequent in the PP group. Pleural effusion (5 studies included: 22.2% vs 17.1%; I2 0%; fixed effect: P = .10; OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.94–2.08) and pulmonary complications were only slightly more frequent in the PP group (4 studies included: 3.6% vs 2.5%; I2 0%; fixed effect: P = .46; OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.54–3.86).

Conclusions

Posterior pericardiotomy seems to significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation and supraventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass grafting. The marked reduction of postoperative pericardial effusion after posterior pericardiotomy suggests that pericardial effusion is one of the main triggers involved in the development of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery.

CTSNet classification: 23, 24

Abbreviations and Acronyms: AF, atrial fibrillation, CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting, CI, confidence interval, OR, odds ratio, PP, posterior pericardiotomy, RR, risk ratio

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Disclosures: None.

PII: S0022-5223(09)00906-4

doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.07.012

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 139, Issue 5 , Pages 1158-1161, May 2010