« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 137, Issue 5
, Pages 1050-1053
, May 2009
Treatment selection for coronary artery disease: The collision of a belief system with evidence
References
- Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:961–972
- ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 appropriateness criteria for coronary revascularization: a report by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:530–553
- ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness criteria for coronary revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology: endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Circulation. 2009;119:1330–1352
- Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: a multicenter, randomized trial (Investigators of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #385, the Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation (AWESOME)). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:143–149
- . Propensity analysis of long-term survival after surgical or percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and high-risk features. Circulation. 2004;109:2290–2295
- Comparing long-term survival of patients with multivessel coronary disease after CABG or PCI: analysis of BARI-like patients in northern New England. Circulation. 2005;112(9 suppl):I371–I376
- Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2174–2183
- Selection of surgical or percutaneous coronary intervention provides differential longevity benefit. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:1420–1428discussion 1428-9
- Drug-eluting stents vs. coronary-artery bypass grafting in multivessel coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:331–341
- . CABG vs. stenting--clinical implications of the SYNTAX trial. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:e10
- . Percutaneous revascularization is the preferred strategy for patients with significant left main coronary stenosis. Circulation. 2009;119:1021–1033
- . Coronary revascularization in context. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:10
This article is being co-published simultaneously in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.
PII: S0022-5223(09)00499-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.043
© 2009 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 137, Issue 5
, Pages 1050-1053
, May 2009
