The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 137, Issue 5 , Pages 1050-1053 , May 2009

Treatment selection for coronary artery disease: The collision of a belief system with evidence

  • Peter K. Smith, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Peter K. Smith, MD, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Duke University, PO Box 3442, 4532 Hosp South, Durham, NC 27710.

Received 5 March 2009 ,Revised 9 March 2009 ,Accepted 10 March 2009.

References 

  1. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. SYNTAX Investigators Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:961–972
  2. Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 appropriateness criteria for coronary revascularization: a report by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:530–553
  1. Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness criteria for coronary revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology: endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Circulation. 2009;119:1330–1352
  2. Morrison DA, Sethi G, Sacks J, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: a multicenter, randomized trial (Investigators of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #385, the Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation (AWESOME)). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:143–149
  3. Brener SJ, Lytle BW, Casserly IP, Schneider JP, Topol EJ, Lauer MS. Propensity analysis of long-term survival after surgical or percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and high-risk features. Circulation. 2004;109:2290–2295
  4. Malenka DJ, Leavitt BJ, Hearne MJ, et al. Comparing long-term survival of patients with multivessel coronary disease after CABG or PCI: analysis of BARI-like patients in northern New England. Circulation. 2005;112(9 suppl):I371–I376
  5. Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Walford G, et al. Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2174–2183
  6. Smith PK, Califf RM, Tuttle RH, et al. Selection of surgical or percutaneous coronary intervention provides differential longevity benefit. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:1420–1428discussion 1428-9
  7. Hannan EL, Wu C, Walford G, et al. Drug-eluting stents vs. coronary-artery bypass grafting in multivessel coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:331–341
  8. Lee TH, Hillis LD, Nabel EG. CABG vs. stenting--clinical implications of the SYNTAX trial. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:e10
  9. Teirstein PS. Percutaneous revascularization is the preferred strategy for patients with significant left main coronary stenosis. Circulation. 2009;119:1021–1033
  10. Lange RA, Hillis LD. Coronary revascularization in context. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:10

 This article is being co-published simultaneously in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

PII: S0022-5223(09)00499-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.043

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 137, Issue 5 , Pages 1050-1053 , May 2009