The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 138, Issue 5 , Pages 1200-1205, November 2009

Reliability of positron emission tomography–computed tomography in identification of mediastinal lymph node status in patients with non–small cell lung cancer

  • Maruf Şanlı, MD

      Affiliations

    • Thoracic Surgery Department, Gaziantep University, School of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Maruf Şanlı, MD, Gaziantep Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Göğüs Cerrahisi AD, 27310-Şehitkamil/Gaziantep/Turkey.
  • ,
  • Ahmet Feridun Isik, MD

      Affiliations

    • Thoracic Surgery Department, Gaziantep University, School of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey
  • ,
  • Sabri Zincirkeser, MD

      Affiliations

    • Nuclear Medicine Department, Gaziantep University, School of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey
  • ,
  • Osman Elbek, MD

      Affiliations

    • Chest Disease Department, Gaziantep University, School of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey
  • ,
  • Ahmet Mete, MD

      Affiliations

    • Radiology Department, Gaziantep University, School of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey
  • ,
  • Bulent Tuncozgur, MD

      Affiliations

    • Thoracic Surgery Department, Gaziantep University, School of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey
  • ,
  • Levent Elbeyli, MD

      Affiliations

    • Thoracic Surgery Department, Gaziantep University, School of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey

Received 1 September 2008; received in revised form 24 February 2009; accepted 23 March 2009. published online 19 June 2009.

Objective

The involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes is a very important prognostic factor in patients with potentially resectable non–small cell lung cancer. Our aim in this study was to investigate the value of positron emission tomographic–computed tomographic scanning in staging lung cancer, especially for mediastinal lymph node evaluation, and to determine whether this could decrease the need for mediastinoscopy.

Methods

Seventy-eight patients with non–small cell lung cancer who were potential candidates for surgical resection and admitted to the thoracic surgery unit of our hospital from March 2006 to June 2008 joined this prospective study. Positron emission tomographic–computed tomographic scanning was performed as part of the prospective studies used to diagnose or stage the tumors. All 78 patients underwent tissue sampling of mediastinal lymph nodes to compare these with imaging results. The diagnostic efficacy of the computed tomographic and positron emission tomographic–computed tomographic scans compared with histopathologic findings were calculated with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy.

Results

Final histology was available on 397 lymph node stations (N1, N2, and N3) sampled from 78 patients during mediastinoscopy or surgical intervention. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of mediastinal lymph node involvement in patients undergoing thoracic computed tomographic scanning were 45.4%, 80.5%, 27.7%, and 90%, respectively. The accuracy of computed tomographic scanning was 75.6%. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of mediastinal lymph node involvement in patients undergoing positron emission tomographic–computed tomographic scanning were 81.8%, 89.5%, 56.2%, and 96.7%, respectively.

Conclusion

There is a need for mediastinoscopy in positron emission tomographic–computed tomographic scanning–positive mediastinal lymph nodes, but it might not be necessary for positron emission tomographic–computed tomographic scanning–negative lymph nodes.

CTSNet classification: 10, 13

Abbreviations and Acronyms: CT, computed tomography, EBUS–FNA, endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration, EUS–FNA, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration, FDG, [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, FNA, fine-needle aspiration, MLN, mediastinal lymph node, NSCLC, non–small cell lung cancer, PET, positron emission tomography, SUV, standardized uptake value

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-5223(09)00489-9

doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.035

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 138, Issue 5 , Pages 1200-1205, November 2009