The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 138, Issue 4 , Pages 843-848, October 2009

Venous thromboembolism in patients receiving multimodality therapy for thoracic malignancies

Toronto General Hospital and Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Received 9 October 2008; received in revised form 10 January 2009; accepted 9 February 2009. published online 13 April 2009.

Objective

The rate of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing multimodality therapy for lung malignancy and the impact of preoperative venous thromboembolism on postoperative outcome have not been analyzed systematically.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing induction therapy before lung resection for non–small cell lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma at the University Health Network between January 1996 and December 2007.

Results

Venous thromboembolism developed in 23 (12.3%) of 186 patients undergoing induction therapy. The venous thromboembolism was diagnosed during induction therapy in 11 patients. The proportion of pulmonary embolism was higher during induction therapy (9/11 patients), whereas deep venous thromboses were observed predominantly postoperatively (7/12 patients) (P = .02). The risk of postoperative complications or death was not increased in patients undergoing surgery despite a preoperative diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. However, the risk of postoperative pulmonary embolism was higher in patients undergoing surgery without insertion of an inferior vena cava filter (1/2 patients vs 0/7 after insertion of an inferior vena cava filter, P = .047). The overall survival was similar between patients with or without venous thromboembolism complications.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that venous thromboembolism events in patients undergoing multimodality therapy for lung malignancies is high and deserves careful consideration. Patients with a venous thromboembolism diagnosis during induction therapy may potentially benefit from a temporary inferior vena cava filter before surgery to limit the risk of recurrent pulmonary embolism. A preoperative diagnosis of venous thromboembolism, however, does not affect early and late outcomes after surgery and should not be viewed as a negative prognostic marker.

Abbreviations and Acronyms: IVC, inferior vena cava, MPM, malignant pleural mesothelioma, NSCLC, non–small cell lung cancer, PE, pulmonary embolism, VTE, venous thromboembolism

CTSNet classification: 10

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-5223(09)00332-8

doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.02.028

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 138, Issue 4 , Pages 843-848, October 2009