The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 137, Issue 5 , Pages 1241-1248 , May 2009

Enhanced fibrinolysis protects against lung ischemia–reperfusion injury

  • Christine L. Lau, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va
  • ,
  • Yunge Zhao, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va
  • ,
  • Jiyoun Kim, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Boston University, Boston, Mass
  • ,
  • Irving L. Kron, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va
  • ,
  • Ashish Sharma, MBBS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va
  • ,
  • Zequan Yang, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va
  • ,
  • Victor E. Laubach, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va
  • ,
  • Joel Linden, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va
  • ,
  • Gorav Ailawadi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Gorav Ailawadi, MD, PO Box 800679, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0679.
  • ,
  • David J. Pinsky, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich

Received 18 September 2008 ,Revised 18 November 2008 ,Accepted 25 December 2008.

  • Image Result

    The fibrinolytic system. This system is strictly regulated by plasminogen activators, plasminogen activator receptor, plasminogen activator inhibitors, and α2-antiplasmin.

    The fibrinolytic system. This system is strictly regulated by plasminogen activators, plasminogen activator receptor, plasminogen activator inhibitors, and α2-antiplasmin.

  • Image Result

    Expression of PAI-1 and fibrin in the WT mice and PAI-1 KO mice. A, Expression of PAI-1 mRNA in WT and PAI-1 KO left lung as determined by real-time PCR. β-actin was used to normalize the PAI-1 mRNA e

    Expression of PAI-1 and fibrin in the WT mice and PAI-1 KO mice. A, Expression of PAI-1 mRNA in WT and PAI-1 KO left lung as determined by real-time PCR. β-actin was used to normalize the PAI-1 mRNA expression. B, Western blot analysis of fibrin expression in the lung from WT-IR and PAI-1 KO IR mice. Fibrin concentration is substantially reduced in PAI-1 KO mice compared with WT mice.

  • Image Result
    Immunohistochemical staining of neutrophils and macrophages in mice lung. Cells stained red indicate neutrophils or migratory macrophage infiltration. All sections were counterstained lightly with hem

    Immunohistochemical staining of neutrophils and macrophages in mice lung. Cells stained red indicate neutrophils or migratory macrophage infiltration. All sections were counterstained lightly with hematoxylin for viewing negatively stained cells. A, D, and G are stained with anti-Mac-2 antibody, B, E, and H are stained with antineutrophils antibody and C, F, and I are stained with normal rat immunoglobulin G (IgG). All figures are 200× magnifications. The bar graph shows the analysis of positive immunostaining of neutrophils and macrophages in the left lung of sham, WT-IR, and PAI-1 KO IR groups. Data shown are the mean ± standard error values for each group.

  • Image Result
    Pulmonary compliance, pulmonary artery pressures, and airway resistance in the PAI-1 KO IR mice compared with the WT-IR and sham mice. These physiologic parameters show less IRI in the PAI-1 KO IR com

    Pulmonary compliance, pulmonary artery pressures, and airway resistance in the PAI-1 KO IR mice compared with the WT-IR and sham mice. These physiologic parameters show less IRI in the PAI-1 KO IR compared to WT-IR. A, Comparison of lung compliance in sham, PAI-1 KO IR, and WT-IR mice. B, Comparison of pulmonary artery (PA) pressure in sham, PAI-1 KO IR, and WT-IR mice. C, Comparison of airway resistance in sham, PAI-1 KO IR and WT-IR mice. Data shown are the mean ± standard error values for each group. All P values are included in graph.

  • Image Result
    Proinflammatory mediators in plasma and BAL of IR injured mice. A, ELISA analysis showing TNF-α and MCP-1 in the plasma of WT-IR and PAI-1 KO IR mice. B, ELISA analysis showing TNF-α, KC, and MIP-2 in

    Proinflammatory mediators in plasma and BAL of IR injured mice. A, ELISA analysis showing TNF-α and MCP-1 in the plasma of WT-IR and PAI-1 KO IR mice. B, ELISA analysis showing TNF-α, KC, and MIP-2 in BAL of WT-IR and PAI-1 KO IR mice. C, Analysis showing mRNA expression of TNF-α, MCP-1, MIP-2, and KC in the left lung of WT and PAI-1 KO mice as determined by real-time PCR. Data shown are the mean ± standard error values for each group.

 Presented in part at the Twenty-eighth Annual Meeting and Scientific Sessions of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, Boston Mass, April 9–12, 2008.

 Dr Lau was supported by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery John W. Kirklin Fellowship (2006–2008) for this research.

PII: S0022-5223(09)00017-8

doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.12.029

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 137, Issue 5 , Pages 1241-1248 , May 2009