The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 137, Issue 5 , Pages 1093-1100, May 2009

Arterial revascularization in primary coronary artery bypass grafting: Direct comparison of 4 strategies—Results of the Stand-in-Y Mammary Study

  • Giuseppe Nasso, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Giuseppe Nasso, MD, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, Via C. Rosalba, 35-37, 70124 Bari, Italy.
  • ,
  • Roberto Coppola, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiac Surgery, Villa Azzurra Hospital, Rapallo, Italy
  • ,
  • Raffaele Bonifazi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy
  • ,
  • Felice Piancone, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy
  • ,
  • Giuseppe Bozzetti, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy
  • ,
  • Giuseppe Speziale, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy

Received 3 July 2008; received in revised form 22 September 2008; accepted 16 October 2008. published online 09 February 2009.

Objective

It is unclear (1) whether the use of 2 arterial conduits rather than a single conduit in multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting significantly improves results despite the concomitant use of saphenous vein grafts and (2) whether any among different configurations of composite grafts (left/right thoracic arteries and radial artery) offers an advantage over the others.

Methods

Eight hundred fifteen patients were randomized to one of 3 different strategies of revascularization by using the left thoracic artery plus the right thoracic artery or using the left thoracic artery plus the radial artery. Venous grafts were used for the remaining targets. Patients randomized to receive 1 arterial graft served as control subjects. Operative mortality and morbidity were comparable among groups.

Results

The rate of cerebrovascular complications was not statistically lower among patients receiving 2 arterial grafts. At 2 years, overall survival was not significantly different among groups (P = .59). Cardiac event–free survival was significantly better in patients receiving 2 arterial grafts versus control subjects (P < .0001), even among elderly patients (P = .022). The 3 investigated strategies using 2 arterial conduits were similar concerning early and midterm results.

Conclusions

Revascularization with 2 arterial conduits offers better midterm event-free survival than a single arterial graft, irrespective of which second-choice arterial conduit is used (radial artery or right thoracic artery), the simultaneous use of saphenous vein grafts, and the patient's age.

CTSNet classification: 23

Abbreviations and Acronyms: CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting, CI, confidence interval, CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass, GSV, great saphenous vein, ITA, internal thoracic artery, LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery, LITA, left internal thoracic artery, OR, odds ratio, RA, radial artery, RITA, right internal thoracic artery

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-5223(08)01744-3

doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.10.029

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 137, Issue 5 , Pages 1093-1100, May 2009