Volume 137, Issue 5 , Pages 1077-1081, May 2009
Mitral leaflet anatomy revisited
Objective
The aims of this work were to employ functional imaging capabilities of the Visible Heart laboratory and endoscopic visualization of mitral valves in perfusion-fixed specimens to better characterize variability in mitral valve leaflet anatomy and to provide a method to classify mitral leaflets that varies from the current nomenclature.
Methods
We gathered functional endoscopic video footage (11 isolated reanimated human hearts) and static endoscopic anatomical images (38 perfusion-fixed specimens) of mitral leaflets. Commissure and cleft locations were charted using Carpentier's accepted description.
Results
All hearts had 2 commissures separating anterior and posterior leaflets. “Standard” clefts separating P1/P2 were found in 66% of hearts (n = 25), and standard clefts separating P2/P3 were present in 71% of hearts (n = 27). “Deviant” clefts occurred in each region of the anterior leaflet (A1, A2, A3), and their relative occurrences were 5%, 8%, and 13% (n = 2, 3, 5), respectively. Deviant clefts were found in posterior leaflets: 13.2% in P1 (n = 5), 32% in P2 (n = 12), and 21% in P3 (n = 8).
Conclusions
Humans elicit complex and highly variable mitral valve anatomy. We suggest a complementary, yet simple nomenclature to address variation in mitral valve anatomy by describing clefts as either standard or deviant and locating regions in which they occur (A1 to A3 or P1 to P3).
CTSNet classification: 35
To access this article, please choose from the options below
This work was supported in part by the Institute for Engineering in Medicine at the University of Minnesota and by Medtronic, Inc.
PII: S0022-5223(08)01670-X
doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.10.008
© 2009 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 137, Issue 5 , Pages 1077-1081, May 2009
