The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 137, Issue 1 , Pages 23-29 , January 2009

The effect of volume on esophageal cancer resections: What constitutes acceptable resection volumes for centers of excellence?

  • Robert A. Meguid, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Division of Thoracic Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Robert A. Meguid, MD, MPH, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, 600 N. Wolfe St, Blalock 240, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287.
  • ,
  • Eric S. Weiss, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Thoracic Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
  • ,
  • David C. Chang, PhD, MPH, MBA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
  • ,
  • Malcolm V. Brock, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Thoracic Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
  • ,
  • Steven C. Yang, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Thoracic Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md

Received 5 May 2007 ,Revised 20 June 2008 ,Accepted 16 September 2008.

  • Image Result

    Graph of in-hospital mortality rates for individual hospitals by annual hospital esophageal resection volume. These data represent the annual hospital mortality rates of in-hospital death at 1506 diff

    Graph of in-hospital mortality rates for individual hospitals by annual hospital esophageal resection volume. These data represent the annual hospital mortality rates of in-hospital death at 1506 different hospitals. The data points have been staggered to illustrate the trend because of the high frequency of overlapping values.

  • Image Result
    Graph showing the different mortality rates above and below each volume threshold. Squares indicate the mortality rates of hospitals with annual esophagectomy volumes for esophageal cancer less than t

    Graph showing the different mortality rates above and below each volume threshold. Squares indicate the mortality rates of hospitals with annual esophagectomy volumes for esophageal cancer less than the volume threshold. Triangles indicate the mortality rates of hospitals with annual esophagectomy volumes for esophageal cancer greater or equal to the volume threshold. The difference between each pair of mortality rates at a given annual hospital volume is statistically significant for all volume thresholds except more than 29 and 34. Associated data are listed in Table 2.

  • Image Result
    Graph of goodness of fit versus annual hospital resection volume. Each point represents one resection volume. McFadden's pseudo r2 is shown as percent. Dashed line represents “baseline” McFadden's pse

    Graph of goodness of fit versus annual hospital resection volume. Each point represents one resection volume. McFadden's pseudo r2 is shown as percent. Dashed line represents “baseline” McFadden's pseudo r2 from the model without resection volume (3.23%).

 Drs Robert A. Meguid and Eric S. Weiss were supported by the Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (T32DK007713) while undertaking this study. Dr Eric S. Weiss is an Irene Piccinini Investigator in Cardiac Surgery.

 Read at the Eighty-seventh Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Washington, DC, May 5-9, 2007.

PII: S0022-5223(08)01635-8

doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.09.040

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 137, Issue 1 , Pages 23-29 , January 2009