The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 136, Issue 3 , Pages 597-604, September 2008

Quality of life outcomes are equivalent after lobectomy in the elderly

  • William R. Burfeind Jr., MD

      Affiliations

    • Thoracic Surgery, St Luke's Health Network, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: William R. Burfeind Jr, MD, 701 Ostrum Street, Suite 201, Bethlehem, PA 18015.
  • ,
  • Betty C. Tong, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Erin O'Branski, PA-C

      Affiliations

    • Division of Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • James E. Herndon, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Statistical Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Eric M. Toloza, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Thomas A. D'Amico, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Linda H. Harpole, MD

      Affiliations

    • GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
  • ,
  • David H. Harpole Jr., MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Received 15 May 2007; received in revised form 17 October 2007; accepted 19 February 2008.

Objective

Prospective analyses of quality of life in elderly patients after lobectomy are limited, yet surgeons often recommend suboptimal therapy to these patients on the basis of the belief that lobectomy is poorly tolerated. Surgical decision making in elderly patients with lung cancer is better informed when the benefits to survival and quality of life after lobectomy are understood.

Methods

By using a validated quality of life instrument, 422 patients were prospectively assessed preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months after lobectomy. Outcomes were analyzed with respect to age (group 1: <70 years and group 2: ≥70 years). The outcome domains of physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, social functioning, global health, and pain in the chest were analyzed using a mixed model. The trend in quality of life was determined according to age. The Kaplan–Meier method was used for analysis of overall survival.

Results

The mean age was 60.1 years in group 1 (N = 256) and 74.7 years in group 2 (N = 166). Baseline demographics and quality of life were similar except that group 2 had better emotional functioning scores and worse pain in the chest scores. Postoperatively, both groups demonstrated significant decreases in quality of life at 3 months. However, at 6 and 12 months, all domains had returned to baseline except physical functioning, which remained below baseline in group 2. Emotional functioning improved postoperatively for both groups. Overall survival at 5 years was not different between groups.

Conclusion

By using a validated quality of life assessment tool with measurements at baseline and serially after resection in a large patient population, this analysis quantifies the degree of impairment of quality of life after lobectomy and documents time to full recovery for both age groups.

Abbreviations and Acronyms: EORTC QLQ, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, NSCLC, non–small cell lung cancer, QOL, quality of life

CTSNet classification: 10

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Washington, D.C., May 8th, 2007.

PII: S0022-5223(08)01095-7

doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.02.093

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 136, Issue 3 , Pages 597-604, September 2008