The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 136, Issue 5 , Pages 1142-1148 , November 2008

Bovine pericardial versus porcine stented replacement aortic valves: Early results of a randomized comparison of the Perimount and the Mosaic valves

Received 11 August 2007 ,Revised 10 December 2007 ,Accepted 27 December 2007.

References 

  1. Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Garcia-Bengoechea JB, Vega M, Rubio J, Sierra J, Duran D, et al. Echocardiographic features of the normofunctioning Labcor-Santiago pericardial bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis. 1994;3:548–555
  2. Dumesnil JG, Honos GN, Lemieux M, Beauchemin J. Validation and application of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:637–643
  3. Williams GA, Labovitz AJ. Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr–Edwards and Björk–Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier–Edwards) cardiac valves. Am J Cardiol. 1985;56:325–332
  4. Cochran R, Kunzelman K. Discrepancies between labeled and actual dimensions of prosthetic valves and sizers. Card Surg. 1996;11:318–324
  5. Eichinger WB, Botzenhardt F, Keithahn A, Guenzinger R, Bleiziffer S, Wagner I, et al. Exercise hemodynamics of bovine versus porcine bioprostheses: a prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:1056–1063
  6. Seitelberger R, Bialy J, Gottardi R, Gernot Seebacher, Reinhard Moidl, Martina Mittelböck, et al. Relation between size of prosthetic and valve gradient: comparison of two aortic bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;25:358–363
  7. Sahn DJ, De Maria A, Kisslo J, Weyman AE the Committee on M-mode Standardization of the American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation. 1978;58:1072–1081
  8. Edmunds LH, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeier GL, Miller DC, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:932–935
  9. Ware JE. Conceptualizing and measuring generic health outcomes. Cancer. 1991;67:774–779
  10. In:  Stewart AL,  Ware JE editor. Measuring functioning and well-being. Durham: Duke University Press; 1992;
  11. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiat Scand. 1983;67:61–70
  12. Butland RJA, Pang J, Gross ER, Woodcock AA, Geddes EM. Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease. Br Med J. 1982;284:1607–1608
  13. Mullaby CJ, Schaff HV, Orszlak TA, Miller FA. Early clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of aortic Intact porcine bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis. 1994;3:641–647
  14. Eichinger WB, Schutz A, Simmerl D, Gansera BU, Breuer M, Haslinger B, et al. The Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position: hemodynamic performance after 2 years. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:S126–S129
  15. Jamieson WR, Janusz MT, MacNab J, Henderson C. Hemodynamic comparison of second- and third-generation stented bioprosthetses in aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:S282–S284
  16. Corbineau H, Lelong B, Langanay T, Verhoye JP, Leguerrier A. Echocardiographic assessment and preliminary clinical results after aortic valve replacement with the Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis. 2001;10:171–176
  17. Eichinger W, Gunzinger R, Botzenhardt F, Simmerl D, Gansera B, Kemkes BM. The Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position at five years. J Heart Valve Dis. 2000;9:653–660
  18. Fradet GJ, Bleese N, Busse E, Jamieson E, Raudkivi P, Goldstein J, et al. The Mosaic valve clinical performance at seven years: results from a multicenter prospective clinical trial. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004;13:239–246
  19. Thomson DJ, Jamieson WRE, Dumesnil JG, Burgess JJ, Peniston CM, Metras J, et al. Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: midterm investigational trial results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:S269–S272
  20. Wong SP, Leggett ME, Greaves SC, Barratt-Boyes BG, Milsom FP, Raudkivi PJ. Early experience with the Mosaic bioprosthesis: a new generation porcine valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1846–1850
  21. Gansera B, Botzenhardt F, Gunzinger R, Spiliopoulos K, Angelis I, Kemkes BM. The Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position: seven years' results. J Heart Valve Dis. 2003;12:354–361
  22. Walther T, Lehmann S, Fal V, Metz S, Doll N, Rastan A, et al. Prospectively randomized evaluation of stented xenograft hemodynamic function in the aortic position. Circulation. 2004;110(11 Suppl 1):II74–II78
  23. Dellgren G, David TE, Raanani E, Armstrong S, Ivanov J, Rakowski H. Late hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier–Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124:146–154
  24. Chambers J, Roxburgh J, Blauth C, O'Riordan J, Hodson F, Rimington H. A randomized comparison of the MCRI On-X and Carbomedics “Top Hat” bileaflet mechanical replacement aortic valves: early postoperative hemodynamic function and clinical events. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:759–764
  25. Ware JE, Kosinski M. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: a manual for users of version 1. 2nd ed. QualityMetric Incorporated: Lincoln [RI]; 2001;ISBN 1-891810-09-X
  26. Phillips RC, Lansky DJ. Outcomes management in heart valve replacement surgery: early experience. J Heart Valve Dis. 1992;1:42–50
  27. Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P. Impact of prosthesis–patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2003;108:983–988
  28. Tasca G, Mhagna Z, Perotti S, Centurini PB, Sabatini T, Amaducci A, et al. Impact of prosthesis–patient mismatch on cardiac events and midterm mortality after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2006;113:570–576
  29. Mohty D, Malouf JF, Girard SE, Schaff HV, Grill DE, Enriquez-Sarano ME, et al. Impact of prosthesis–patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St. Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation. 2006;113:420–426
  30. Dalmau MJ, Maria Gonzalez-Santos J, Lopez-Rodriguez J, Bueno M, Arribas A, Nieto F. One year hemodynamic performance of the Perimount Magna pericardial xenograft and the Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position: a prospective randomized study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007;6:345–349

 This study was funded with an unrestricted educational grant from Medtronic.

PII: S0022-5223(08)01080-5

doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.086

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 136, Issue 5 , Pages 1142-1148 , November 2008

Article Tools