The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 136, Issue 3 , Pages 657-664, September 2008

Early and long-term outcomes in the elderly: Comparison between off-pump and on-pump techniques in 1191 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

  • Yan Li, MD
  • ,
  • Zhe Zheng, MD
  • ,
  • Shengshou Hu, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Shengshou Hu, MD, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Institute and Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 167 Beilishilu, Beijing, China 100037.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Institute and Fuwai Hospital, CAMS, Beijing, China

Received 19 September 2007; received in revised form 19 November 2007; accepted 18 December 2007. published online 28 July 2008.

Objective

The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on early and long-term mortality and morbidity in a consecutive series of elderly patients (aged > 65 years) compared with conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.

Methods

From January of 1999 to December of 2003, data were extracted for 1191 patients aged more than 65 years: a conventional coronary artery bypass grafting group (n = 744) and an off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting group (n = 447). Age-related early outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality and postoperative morbidities. Long-term outcomes, including total mortality, repeated revascularization, Q-wave myocardial infarction, stroke, readmission, and the combination of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeated revascularization, were evaluated with Cox regression analysis.

Results

Univariate analysis for early outcomes showed significant benefits from off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, there was still a benefit of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses (propensity matched cases) showed that stroke, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and readmission occurred more frequently in the off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting group (P < .001). There was a nonsignificant trend to higher total mortality (P = .193) and higher repeated revascularization rates (P = .067) in the off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting group. Cox regression for long-term outcomes showed that patients in the off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting group had a higher incidence of stroke (hazard ratio 2.611, 95% confidence interval 2.152–3.070), readmission (hazard ratio 2.000, 95% confidence interval 1.747–2.253), and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio 1.764, 95% confidence interval 1.456–2.072).

Conclusion

Our analysis shows that off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting compared with conventional coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with favorable early outcomes in the elderly population. However, the early benefits of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting were not maintained in the long term, and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting showed trends toward worse long-term results.

Abbreviations and Acronyms: CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting, CCABG, conventional coronary artery bypass grafting, CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass, OPCAB, off-pump coronary artery bypass, MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event, PVD, peripheral vascular disease

CTSNet classification: 23

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-5223(08)00826-X

doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.069

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 136, Issue 3 , Pages 657-664, September 2008