« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 136, Issue 2
, Pages 494-499.e8
, August 2008
Quality improvement program decreases mortality after cardiac surgery
References
- . Quality measurement in adult cardiac surgery: introduction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(4 Suppl):S1–S2
- Quality measurement in adult cardiac surgery: part 1—Conceptual framework and measure selection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(4 Suppl):S3–S12
- ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). [published erratum appears in Circulation. 2005;111:2014] Circulation. 2004;110:e340–e437
- . Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:319–325
- . Predicting the risk of death from heart failure after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:596–601
- A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. JAMA. 1991;266:803–809
- . A methodology for QI in the coronary artery bypass grafting procedure involving comparative process analysis. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992;18:129–133
- Association of a continuous quality improvement initiative with practice and outcome variations of contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions. Circulation. 2006;113:814–822
- Use of continuous quality improvement to increase use of process measures in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290:49–56
- . Facilitating the recovery of open heart surgery patients through quality improvement efforts and CareMAP implementation. Am J Crit Care. 1996;5:346–352
- . Quality improvement in cardiac care. Arch Surg. 2002;137:28–36
- Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group and the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1857–1863
- . Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17:2265–2281
- Quality measurement in adult cardiac surgery: part 2—statistical considerations in composite measure scoring and provider rating. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(4 Suppl):S13–S26
- Reduction of surgical mortality and morbidity in diabetic patients undergoing cardiac surgery with a combined intravenous and subcutaneous insulin glucose management strategy. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:823–828
- Association of sex, physical size, and operative mortality after coronary artery bypass in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982;84:334–341
- Effect of risk-adjusted, non-dialysis-dependent renal dysfunction on mortality and morbidity following coronary artery bypass surgery: a multi-centre study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29:964–970
- Beating heart versus conventional single-vessel reoperative coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1383–1387
- . Prospective evaluation of coronary arteries: influence on operative risk in coronary artery surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;16:429–434
- Beating heart surgery in octogenarians: perioperative outcome and comparison with younger age groups. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1140–1145
- . Perioperative determinants of morbidity and mortality in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:S163–S172
- Intensive insulin therapy in mixed medical/surgical intensive care units: benefit versus harm. Diabetes. 2006;55:3151–3159
PII: S0022-5223(08)00213-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.08.081
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 136, Issue 2
, Pages 494-499.e8
, August 2008
