The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 135, Issue 2 , Pages 269-273, February 2008

Results of a prospective algorithm to remove chest tubes after pulmonary resection with high output

  • Robert James Cerfolio, MD, FACS, FCCP

      Affiliations

    • Section of Thoracic Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Robert J. Cerfolio, MD, Professor of Surgery, Chief of Section of Thoracic Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 703 19th St S, ZRB 739, Birmingham, AL 35294.
  • ,
  • Ayesha S. Bryant, MSPH, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala

Received 25 June 2007; received in revised form 7 August 2007; accepted 17 August 2007. published online 03 January 2008.

Objective

Many patients have their hospital discharge delayed because their chest tube drainage is too high, despite the fact that there are no data to support the commonly used 250 mL/day threshold.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted with a prospective database and prospective algorithm from one surgeon. All patients underwent elective pulmonary resection. The last chest tube was removed if there was no air leak and nonchylous drainage of 450 mL/day or less.

Results

The study comprised 8608 operations and 2077 patients who underwent an elective (nonpneumonectomy) pulmonary resection via thoracotomy by one general thoracic surgeon over a 10-year period. Eighty-nine patients went home with a chest tube owing to air leak. The remaining 1988 patients were discharged without a chest tube. Types of pulmonary resection were wedge resection in 729 patients, segmentectomy in 214, lobectomy in 1104, and bilobectomy in 30. The median day of discharge was postoperative day 4. One hundred one (5%) were readmitted to the hospital within 60 days of discharge. The most common reason for readmission was dehydration and fatigue. Only 11 (0.55%) had readmissions owing to recurrent symptomatic effusion and most were treated with video-assisted thoracoscopy. Follow-up was 100% at 4 weeks and 93% at 8 weeks.

Conclusions

Chest tubes can be removed with up to 450 mL/day of nonchylous drainage after pulmonary resection, and perhaps a higher volume could be accepted. Readmission owing to a recurrent effusion is exceedingly uncommon, and the practice of leaving the tube in longer for drainage less than 450 mL/day is unsupported in the literature.

CTSNet classification: 10, 11

Abbreviation and Acronym: POD, postoperative day

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the Thirty-third Annual Meeting of the Western Thoracic Surgical Association, Santa Ana Pueblo, NM, June 27–30, 2007.

PII: S0022-5223(07)01746-1

doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.08.066

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 135, Issue 2 , Pages 269-273, February 2008