« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 134, Issue 5
, Pages
1150-1156
, November 2007
Surgical aspects of endovascular retrograde implantation of the aortic CoreValve bioprosthesis in high-risk older patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis
-
CoreValve percutaneous aortic prosthesis (A). Perioperative x-ray imaging demonstrating 23-mm balloon dilatation of the stenotic aortic valve (B). Retrograde delivery catheter advancement toward the a
CoreValve percutaneous aortic prosthesis (A). Perioperative x-ray imaging demonstrating 23-mm balloon dilatation of the stenotic aortic valve (B). Retrograde delivery catheter advancement toward the aortic arch and deployment of the prosthesis (C–E). A perioperative angiogram demonstrated excellent position and function of the bioprosthesis. The left and right coronary ostia are patent. There is no evidence of intraprosthetic or periprosthetic insufficiency (F).
-
Improvements in the aortic valve (AV) area (A) and mean transaortic gradient after endovascular AVR (B). Aortic valve regurgitation remained mild (≤ grade 2, and ≤ grade 1 in most) immediately after AImprovements in the aortic valve (AV) area (A) and mean transaortic gradient after endovascular AVR (B). Aortic valve regurgitation remained mild (≤ grade 2, and ≤ grade 1 in most) immediately after AVR and during follow-up (C). Improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (D). Each curve represents the data for 1 patient. PAVR, Percutaneous aortic valve replacement; AI, aortic insufficiency; SD, standard deviation.
PII: S0022-5223(07)01300-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.07.031
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 134, Issue 5
, Pages
1150-1156
, November 2007
