The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 134, Issue 1 , Pages 218-224 , July 2007

A reinforced sternal wiring technique for transverse thoracosternotomy closure in bilateral lung transplantation: From biomechanical test to clinical application

  • Takahiro Oto, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Lung Transplant Unit, The Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Takahiro Oto, MD, PhD, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Okayama University Medical School, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
  • ,
  • Ramkumar Venkatachalam

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Sciences, Biomechanical and Tissue Engineering Group, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
  • ,
  • Yos S. Morsi, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Sciences, Biomechanical and Tissue Engineering Group, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
  • ,
  • Silvana Marasco, MS, FRACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Lung Transplant Unit, The Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • Adrian Pick, FRACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Lung Transplant Unit, The Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • Marc Rabinov, PhD, FRACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Lung Transplant Unit, The Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • Franklin Rosenfeldt, MD, FRACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Lung Transplant Unit, The Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Received 28 December 2006 ,Revised 22 February 2007 ,Accepted 8 March 2007.

  • Image Result

    The new reinforced wiring technique. Two peristernal stainless-steel wires are placed on the each side of the sternum at the level of the third and fifth intercostal spaces inside the conventional 2 l

    The new reinforced wiring technique. Two peristernal stainless-steel wires are placed on the each side of the sternum at the level of the third and fifth intercostal spaces inside the conventional 2 longitudinal wires, which cross the sternotomy line.

  • Image Result
    The appearance of the bone models before and after destructive testing. The parasternal wires in the reinforced wiring group prevented the longitudinal wires from cutting through the bone until the ma

    The appearance of the bone models before and after destructive testing. The parasternal wires in the reinforced wiring group prevented the longitudinal wires from cutting through the bone until the material itself parted. In contrast, failure of fixation in the conventional wiring group occurred because of the wires cutting through the bone.

  • Image Result
    Three biomechanical variables, including yield loading (in newtons), maximum loading (in newtons), and postyield stiffness (in newtons per millimeter), were used in this analysis. The yield load was d

    Three biomechanical variables, including yield loading (in newtons), maximum loading (in newtons), and postyield stiffness (in newtons per millimeter), were used in this analysis. The yield load was defined as the point on the load-displacement curve at which the curve became nonlinear at the initiation of the wire cutting through the bone. The maximum load was the ultimate strength of the construct. The postyield stiffness was the slope of the load-displacement curve over a 2-mm displacement beyond the yield point.

  • Image Result
    Load-displacement curve of biomechanical testing. A, Longitudinal distraction. In the reinforced wiring group yield load (P = .03), maximum load (P = .03), and postyield stiffness (P = .04) were signi

    Load-displacement curve of biomechanical testing. A, Longitudinal distraction. In the reinforced wiring group yield load (P = .03), maximum load (P = .03), and postyield stiffness (P = .04) were significantly greater than in the conventional wiring group. B, Anterior–posterior shear. Yield load (P = .03) and postyield stiffness (P = .04) in the reinforced wiring group were significantly greater than in the conventional wiring group.

PII: S0022-5223(07)00526-0

doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.03.003

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 134, Issue 1 , Pages 218-224 , July 2007