Volume 134, Issue 1 , Pages 229-230, July 2007
Pseudoaneurysm of left ventricular apex caused by a left ventricular venting catheter through the right superior pulmonary vein
Article Outline
CTSNet classification: 18
We report a case of left ventricular pseudoaneurysm secondary to a left ventricular venting catheter through the right superior pulmonary vein during aortic dissection surgery. Despite our strong recommendation for surgery, the patient refused.
Clinical Summary
A left ventricular pseudoaneurysm secondary to a left ventricular venting catheter through the pulmonary vein is rarely reported.1 An 85-year-old female patient was admitted with fever and abdominal pain, and pneumonia was diagnosed. During the discharge plan, sudden fever and chest pain developed in the patient. An electrocardiogram, a cardiac enzyme study, and a chest computed tomographic (CT) scan were performed to evaluate her symptoms. Other study results proved normal, but the chest CT scan showed type A aortic dissection. The ascending aorta and part of the arch were replaced by artificial grafts. Total circulatory arrest and selective cerebral perfusion were induced with axillary artery cannulation and a left ventricular venting catheter through the right superior pulmonary vein. There was severe pericardial adhesion, and a dissection of the adhesion was performed minimally only for the operation. The operation was uneventful, and 3 days later the patient was transferred to the general ward.
Discussion
Twenty days after the operation, a follow-up CT scan was performed, showing a pseudoaneurysm of the left ventricular apex (Figure 1). A follow-up echocardiogram also showed muscular disruption at the left ventricular apex with a 6.0 m/sec flow through the neck of the pseudoaneurysm (Figure 2). Because there was no evidence of perioperative myocardial ischemia, such as an electrocardiogram change, a cardiac enzyme elevation, or a regional wall motion abnormality around the pseudoaneurysm, the pseudoaneurysm may have resulted from trauma to the left ventricular apex by the tip of the left ventricular venting catheter. It is likely that the left ventricular muscle damage during the operation was not seen because of the pericardial adhesion.

Figure 1.
Comparison of preoperative and postoperative CT scans at the same level. A, B, Preoperative CT scan without evidence of the left ventricular pseudoaneurysm. C, D, Postoperative CT scan showing pseudoaneurysmal change of the left ventricular apex.

Figure 2.
Postoperative echocardiogram. A, 2.62 × 2.77-cm pseudoaneurysm at the left ventricular apex. B, Flow through the neck of the pseudoaneurysm.
Despite our strong recommendations for surgery, the patient refused and was discharged. One month later, a follow-up echocardiogram showed no interval change.
Reference
PII: S0022-5223(07)00206-1
doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.018
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 134, Issue 1 , Pages 229-230, July 2007
