The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 133, Issue 5 , Pages 1154-1162 , May 2007

Hemodynamic effects of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in cardiac surgery: Assessment using magnetic resonance imaging

  • Rainer Petzina, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • ,
  • Martin Ugander, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • ,
  • Lotta Gustafsson, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • ,
  • Henrik Engblom, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • ,
  • Johan Sjögren, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • ,
  • Roland Hetzer, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • German Heart Institute, Berlin, Germany.
  • ,
  • Richard Ingemansson, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • ,
  • Håkan Arheden, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • ,
  • Malin Malmsjö, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Malin Malmsjö, MD, PhD, Vascular Research, Lund University, BMC A13, SE-221 84 Lund, Sweden.

Received 26 September 2006 ,Revised 2 January 2007 ,Accepted 8 January 2007.

  • Image Result

    Cross section of the thoracic cavity with an open sternotomy. The heart is covered with 4 layers of paraffin gauze dressing. A polyurethane foam dressing is placed between the sternal edges, and nonco

    Cross section of the thoracic cavity with an open sternotomy. The heart is covered with 4 layers of paraffin gauze dressing. A polyurethane foam dressing is placed between the sternal edges, and noncollapsible drainage tubes are inserted into the foam. The open wound is sealed with transparent adhesive drape, and drainage tubes are connected to a purpose-built vacuum source.

  • Image Result
    Cardiac output (A and D), stroke volume (B and E), and heart rate (C and F) were measured using the established technique for MRI flow quantification. Measurements were performed before the vacuum sou

    Cardiac output (A and D), stroke volume (B and E), and heart rate (C and F) were measured using the established technique for MRI flow quantification. Measurements were performed before the vacuum source was turned on (VAC off) and at a negative pressure of 75 mm Hg (white bars), 125 mm Hg (light gray bars), and 175 mm Hg (dark gray bars), and 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 and 3 minutes after the vacuum source was turned on (VAC on). Measurements were undertaken both with (A, B, and C) and without (D, E, and F) 4 layers of paraffin gauze dressing covering the heart. The results are shown as means of 6 experiments. *P < .05, **P < .01, and ***P < .001. Note how cardiac output and stroke volume decrease over time.

  • Image Result
    Results from one experiment during the application of −175 mm Hg in a sternotomy wound without interface dressing. Real-time MRI flow quantification in the ascending aorta throughout 42 seconds of the

    Results from one experiment during the application of −175 mm Hg in a sternotomy wound without interface dressing. Real-time MRI flow quantification in the ascending aorta throughout 42 seconds of the application of VAC (top panel). VAC on denotes when the vacuum source was turned on, and sternal edges adapted denotes when the lateral movement of the sternal edges was completed, which presumably reflects the completion of VAC application. (Bottom panel) A magnification of the flow in the top panel during representative heart beats. The first 2 beats (duration = 1.5 seconds) show representative flow prior to the application of VAC. The second 2 beats (duration = 1.5 seconds) show representative flow after the completion of VAC application, showing a reduced area under the curve compared with the bottom left panel, indicating a reduced stroke volume. These data are the basis for the results presented in Figure 4.

  • Image Result
    Changes in cardiac output (top), stroke volume (middle), and heart rate (bottom) measured using real-time MRI flow quantification during the application of −175 mm Hg in a sternotomy wound without int

    Changes in cardiac output (top), stroke volume (middle), and heart rate (bottom) measured using real-time MRI flow quantification during the application of −175 mm Hg in a sternotomy wound without interface dressing. VAC on denotes when the vacuum source was turned on, and sternal edges adapted denotes when the lateral movement of the sternal edges was completed, which presumably reflects the completion of VAC application. Note how the cardiac output and stroke volume declined during the application of negative pressure and then seemed to stabilize. See Methods for further details.

  • Image Result
    End-diastolic volume (top) and end-systolic volume (bottom) were measured using MRI chamber volume quantification before VAC negative pressure was turned on (0 mm Hg) and approximately 1.5 minutes aft

    End-diastolic volume (top) and end-systolic volume (bottom) were measured using MRI chamber volume quantification before VAC negative pressure was turned on (0 mm Hg) and approximately 1.5 minutes after the application of −75, −125, and −175 mm Hg. Measurements were undertaken both with and without a wound interface dressing covering the heart. The results are shown as means of 6 experiments. *P < .05, **P < .01, and ***P < .001.

  • Image Result
    The vacuum source was set to successively deliver negative pressures from 50 to 200 mm Hg at 25 mm Hg increments. Wound pressures were recorded with no interface dressing (under foam) and after the in

    The vacuum source was set to successively deliver negative pressures from 50 to 200 mm Hg at 25 mm Hg increments. Wound pressures were recorded with no interface dressing (under foam) and after the interposition of 4 layers of the paraffin gauze dressings (under interface dressing). Values are presented as means ± SEM from 6 experiments. **P < .01. Note how the pressure in the wound was lower in the presence of an interface dressing.

 This study was supported by the Anders Otto Swärds Foundation/Ulrika Eklunds Foundation, Anna Lisa and Sven Eric Lundgrens foundation for medical research, Åke Wiberg Foundation, the M. Bergvall Foundation, the Swedish Medical Association, the Royal Physiographic Society in Lund, the Swedish Medical Research Council, the Crafoord Foundation, the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, the Swedish Government Grant for Clinical Research, and the Swedish Hypertension Society.

PII: S0022-5223(07)00143-2

doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.011

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 133, Issue 5 , Pages 1154-1162 , May 2007