The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 133, Issue 4 , Pages 865-875 , April 2007

Case complexity scores in congenital heart surgery: A comparative study of the Aristotle Basic Complexity score and the Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS-1) system

Read at the Eighty-fifth Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, San Francisco, Calif, April 10-13, 2005.

  • Osman O. Al-Radi, MD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  • ,
  • Frank E. Harrell Jr, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn.
  • ,
  • Christopher A. Caldarone, MD

      Affiliations

    • Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  • ,
  • Brian W. McCrindle, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  • ,
  • Jeffrey P. Jacobs, MD

      Affiliations

    • The Congenital Heart Institute of Florida, University of South Florida, Saint Petersburg, Fla.
  • ,
  • M. Gail Williams

      Affiliations

    • Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  • ,
  • Glen S. Van Arsdell, MD

      Affiliations

    • Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  • ,
  • William G. Williams, MD

      Affiliations

    • Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: William G. Williams, MD, 555 University Avenue, Room 1525, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.

Received 20 April 2005 ,Revised 26 April 2006 ,Accepted 17 May 2006.

  • Image Result

    Observed (gray) and predicted (black) probability of in-hospital death over calendar year of operation. A, For ABC levels (score range), 1 (1.5-5.9), 2 (6-7.9), 3 (8-9.9), and 4 (10-15). B, For RACHS-

    Observed (gray) and predicted (black) probability of in-hospital death over calendar year of operation. A, For ABC levels (score range), 1 (1.5-5.9), 2 (6-7.9), 3 (8-9.9), and 4 (10-15). B, For RACHS-1 categories 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5/6.

  • Image Result
    The predictive value of robust logistic models of ABC, RACHS-1, and both scores combined. Unadjusted models, models adjusted for the calendar year of operation, and models adjusted for calendar year o

    The predictive value of robust logistic models of ABC, RACHS-1, and both scores combined. Unadjusted models, models adjusted for the calendar year of operation, and models adjusted for calendar year of operation and the child’s age at operation are presented. The predictive value is represented by the model LR and adequacy index (% likelihood ratio χ2 attributable to the nested model, which does include both ABC and RACHS-1; see Methods). P values shown are of an LR χ2 test for nested models with 4 degrees of freedom.

  • Image Result
    The number of patients (Frequency) assigned to intervals of predicted risk by ABC, RACHS-1, or both with extreme (ie, very low [<1%] and very high [>15%]) scores predicted in-hospital mortality. Model

    The number of patients (Frequency) assigned to intervals of predicted risk by ABC, RACHS-1, or both with extreme (ie, very low [<1%] and very high [>15%]) scores predicted in-hospital mortality. Models with more frequent extreme predictions are more clinically useful. The cutoffs of 1% and 15% were approximately the 5th and 95th percentiles of predicted risk of in-hospital death.

  • Image Result
    Cumulative incidence plots of death before discharge versus discharge alive over time from the day of operation (time 0). A, For ABC levels (score range), 1 (1.5-5.9), 2 (6-7.9), 3 (8-9.9), and 4 (10-

    Cumulative incidence plots of death before discharge versus discharge alive over time from the day of operation (time 0). A, For ABC levels (score range), 1 (1.5-5.9), 2 (6-7.9), 3 (8-9.9), and 4 (10-15). B, For RACHS-1 categories 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5/6. The time point (x-axis point) corresponding to a cumulative incidence (y-axis point) of 0.5 on the dashed curve represents the mean time to discharge from hospital.

PII: S0022-5223(06)02281-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.05.071

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 133, Issue 4 , Pages 865-875 , April 2007