Volume 133, Issue 2 , Pages 369-377.e4, February 2007
Endovascular stent grafting versus open surgical repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms in low-risk patients: A multicenter comparative trial
Objective
Results are presented from the first completed multicenter trial directed at gaining approval from the US Food and Drug Administration of endovascular versus open surgical repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms.
Methods
Between September 1999 and May 2001, 140 patients with descending thoracic aneurysms were enrolled at 17 sites and evaluated for a Gore TAG Thoracic Endograft. An open surgical control cohort of 94 patients was identified by enrolling historical and concurrent subjects. Patients were assessed before treatment, at treatment, and at hospital discharge and returned for follow-up visits at 1 month, 6 months, and annually thereafter.
Results
One hundred thirty-seven of 140 patients had successful implantation of the endograft. Perioperative mortality in the endograft versus open surgical control cohort was 2.1% (n = 3) versus 11.7% (n = 11, P < .001). Thirty-day analysis revealed a statistically significant lower incidence of the following complications in the endovascular cohort versus the surgical cohort: spinal cord ischemia (3% vs 14%), respiratory failure (4% vs 20%), and renal insufficiency (1% vs 13%). The endovascular group had a higher incidence of peripheral vascular complications (14% vs 4%). The mean lengths of intensive care unit stay (2.6 ± 14.6 vs 5.2 ± 7.2 days) and hospital stay (7.4 ± 17.7 vs 14.4 ± 12.8 days) were significantly shorter in the endovascular cohort. At 1 and 2 years’ follow-up, the incidence of endoleaks was 6% and 9%, respectively. Through 2 years of follow-up, there were 3 reinterventions in the endograft cohort and none in the open surgical control cohort. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed no difference in overall mortality at 2 years.
Conclusions
In this multicenter study early outcomes with descending aortic endovascular stent grafting were very encouraging when compared with those of a well-matched surgical cohort. However, at 2 years’ follow-up, there is an incidence of endoleaks and reinterventions associated with endovascular versus open surgical repair. Continued vigilant surveillance of patients treated with an endograft is important.
Abbreviations and Acronyms: AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm, ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists, CT, computed tomography, CVA, cerebrovascular accident, DTA, descending thoracic aortic aneurysm
Supported by W. L. Gore, Flagstaff, Arizona.Joseph Bavaria, Michel Makaroun, Joel Verter, Zi-Fan Yu, and Scott Mitchell report consulting fees from W. L. Gore. Joseph Bavaria and Michel Makaroun report grant support from W. L. Gore.Read at the Eighty-fifth Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, San Francisco, Calif, April 10-13, 2005.
PII: S0022-5223(06)01608-4
doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.07.040
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to article:
- Endovascular stenting for descending aneurysms: Wave of the future or the emperor’s new clothes?
Volume 133, Issue 2 , Pages 369-377.e4, February 2007
