Does aprotinin influence the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass in patients?☆☆☆
Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Orlando, Fla, October 1998.
Received 16 April 2001; received in revised form 26 June 2001 and 25 July 2001; accepted 15 November 2001.
Refers to article:
The unwanted response to cardiac surgery: Time for a reappraisal?
David Royston, Tomas Kovesi, Nandi Marczin
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
January 2003 (Vol. 125, Issue 1, Pages 32-35) Abstract |
Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (61 KB)
Abstract
Objectives: Aprotinin has been shown to have anti-inflammatory properties, but its effects on the inflammatory reaction to cardiopulmonary bypass remain controversial. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the influence of aprotinin on various blood markers of inflammation during and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods: Sixty male patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. The patients were randomized into 3 groups: a placebo group, a second group receiving 2,000,000 KIU of aprotinin followed by an infusion of 500,000 KIU/h and 2,000,000 KIU in the pump prime, and a third group receiving half this dosage. Measurements of tumor necrosis factor, interleukin 6, interleukin 8, interleukin 10, endotoxin, histamine, complement factors, prekallikrein, and prostaglandin D2 were obtained at baseline, 30 minutes after study drug loading, 10 minutes after the beginning of cardiopulmonary bypass, before the end of bypass, 4 hours after bypass, and on the first and second postoperative days. Results: Aprotinin had no significant effect on any of these parameters. As expected, aprotinin reduced early blood loss in both treated groups. Conclusions: These results indicate that aprotinin at doses currently used to reduce blood loss has no significant influence on the systemic inflammatory response during moderate hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in human subjects, as assessed by the mediators measured in this study.
From the Departments of Anesthesiology,a Intensive Care Medicine,b and Anesthesiology,c Erasme University Hospital, and the Department of Immunology,d Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
☆ This work was supported by a grant from Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany.
☆☆ Address for reprints: Denis Schmartz, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Erasme University Hospital, 808 route de Lennik, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium (E-mail: denis.schmartz@ulb.ac.be).