The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 123, Issue 3 , Pages 443-450, March 2002

Aortic arch reconstruction with pulmonary autograft patch aortoplasty☆☆

  • Régine Roussin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Le Plessis-Robinson, France
  • ,
  • Emre Belli, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Le Plessis-Robinson, France
    • Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Deutsches Kinderherzzentrum, Sankt Augustin, Germany
  • ,
  • François Lacour-Gayet, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Le Plessis-Robinson, France
  • ,
  • Francois Godart, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital, Lille, France
  • ,
  • Christian Rey, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital, Lille, France
  • ,
  • Jacqueline Bruniaux, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Le Plessis-Robinson, France
  • ,
  • Claude Planché, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Le Plessis-Robinson, France
  • ,
  • Alain Serraf, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Le Plessis-Robinson, France

Received 14 May 2001; received in revised form 22 June 2001 and 24 July 2001; accepted 7 September 2001.

Abstract 

Objective: The optimal technique for aortic arch reconstruction through median sternotomy is still under debate. We have introduced the technique of pulmonary autograft patch aortoplasty as a reliable alternative. Methods: The outcomes of 51 infants who underwent neonatal repair of interrupted aortic arch (n = 28) or coarctation associated with ventricular septal defect (n = 23) since 1992 were analyzed. The patients were reviewed in three groups according to the aortic arch reconstruction technique: group I underwent direct anastomosis (n = 23), group II underwent homograft or pericardial patch aortoplasty (n = 8), and group III underwent pulmonary autograft patch aortoplasty (n = 20). The pulmonary autograft patch consisted in the anterior wall of the main pulmonary artery, between the supracommissural level and the divided ductus arteriosus. The created defect was replaced with fresh autologous pericardium. Results: All patients except 1 were discharged without significant residual gradient at the level of the aortic arch. At a median delay of 7 months (range 2-51 months), 11 patients (22%) had recurrence of arch obstruction and underwent balloon angioplasty (n = 8) or surgical correction (n = 3). One patient who had undergone direct anastomosis required reoperation for bronchial compression. At a median follow-up of 29 months, the actuarial freedoms from recurrent arch obstruction were 81% for direct anastomosis, 28% for homograft or pericardial patch aortoplasty, and 100% for pulmonary autograft aortoplasty (P = .03 for group III vs group I and P < .0001 for group III vs group II). Conclusions: The aortic arch repair associated with pulmonary autograft patch augmentation resulted in superior midterm outcomes and therefore constitutes a reliable alternative to the direct anastomosis technique. It allowed complete relief of anatomic afterload and diminished the anastomotic tension, thus reducing the risk of restenosis and tracheobronchial compression. We observed a significantly higher rate of recurrence after patch aortoplasty with other materials.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;123:443-50

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Read at the Eighty-first Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, San Diego, Calif, May 6-9, 2001.

☆☆ Address for reprints: Alain Serraf, MD, Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, 133, Avenue de la Résistance, 92300, Le Plessis-Robinson, France.

PII: S0022-5223(02)37555-X

doi:10.1067/mtc.2002.120733

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 123, Issue 3 , Pages 443-450, March 2002